Abstract
As the commercial space industry grows and technology breakthroughs push humans further into space, the environmental impacts of these ventures are becoming increasingly evident. Air pollution from rocket launches, space debris, and the industry’s possible long-term consequences on Earth’s ecology are the primary topics of this paper’s examination of the space industry’s ecological implications. The paper particularly stresses the importance of strong regulatory mechanisms, international cooperation, and environmentally responsible space exploration methods. In order to preserve Earth and space for decades to come, we must cultivate a space industry that places an emphasis on ecological stewardship in addition to scientific and commercial accomplishments.
Introduction
What was once the purview of science fiction – the conquering of space – has become a dramatic display of human creativity and will. From the momentous journey of Yuri Gagarin to the unforgettable footsteps of the Apollo astronauts on the moon, the history of space exploration is filled with remarkable landmarks. The International Space Station and the Hubble Space Telescope contribute to humanity’s relentless pursuit of knowledge beyond Earth. Commercial spaceflight and other ambitious programs are bringing in a new era of space exploration, but before jumping into this new era, it is necessary to have a critical conversation about the environmental consequences of these endeavors.
The space industry is at a crossroads, thanks to the collaboration between public space agencies and private sector behemoths. Numerous and intricate environmental concerns are raised by this sector, including rocket launches’ effects on the atmosphere, the growing problem of space debris, and the moral dilemmas surrounding the preservation of our planet. The growing frequency of space activities, driven by advances in technology and investments in new funding sources, highlights the critical need for responsible management of these heavenly undertakings. By offering a bird’s-eye perspective of the ecological difficulties and possibilities that come hand in hand with our ascent to the stars, this paper seeks to untangle the complex web of environmental effects caused by the space industry.
1. Present-Day Space Exploration
In earlier times, launches were few as the space business was mostly involved in exploratory, national security, and government missions. This limited frequency meant that the industry had less of an impact on the environment. A transition towards a space industry driven largely by commerce and tourists has been indicated by the significant uptick in launch operations in the past few years, with 104 launches in 2020 and 134 in 2021. In fact, the industry is going through a period of unparalleled investment boom, which is also causing a notable spike in the quantity of items sent into orbit. Hundreds of thousands of satellites could be in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) by the end of this decade, thanks to private businesses and states’ development of mega-constellations (Nolan, 2023). Companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic sit alongside public organizations like Roscosmos and NASA, creating a modern space economy that is rich with innovation and cooperation. Such technological advancements have significantly lowered the price of satellite launches, opening space exploration to more people and organizations. The tremendous appeal of business potential is fueling this space research renaissance, which is in turn driven by the quest for knowledge. Global telecommunications and GPS services are only two examples of how pervasive satellite technology is in today’s society, demonstrating the vital function that assets in orbit play in the global information infrastructure. Also, the space industry’s lofty goals of colonizing Mars and the Moon are exemplified by the growing space tourism industry.
As mentioned in the Time, out of a total of 217 SpaceX’s Falcon 9 flights since launch in 2010, 61 of them took place in 2022 (Kluger, 2023). The increasing frequency of rocket launches, together with this fast increase, has raised environmental concerns that need to be examined, as rocket propellant combustion disperses a complex mixture of contaminants into Earth’s atmosphere, exacerbating both air pollution and global warming.
2. The Environmental Impact of the Industry
The environmental effects of rocket launches, reentry and the increasing problem of space debris are three examples of the many sustainability issues that the growth of the space industry is adding to the list of Earth- and space-related worries.
2.1 Rocket Launches and Reentry
Before delving into the environmental impacts of rocket launches and reentry, it is important to have a brief explanation on the atmospheric layers. The Earth’s atmosphere is broken down into its layers, with the troposphere being the lowest and home to most human-caused emissions; the stratosphere being the uppermost and containing the protective ozone layer; the mesosphere being the layer from which satellites re-enter the atmosphere; and finally, the upper thermosphere and exosphere making up the remaining layers. Launch altitude determines the relative influence of various rocket emissions due to the stratified structure of Earth’s atmosphere. To amplify the effects of human-caused climate change, tropospheric emissions add to atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gasses. Pollutants released into the stratosphere, on the other hand, have the potential to upset the ozone layer’s protective chemical equilibrium.
Around 180 rocket launches take place annually across the globe, releasing about 1,000 metric tons of soot into space, according to studies cited by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Different rockets employ different propellants, and these propellants have distinct impacts on the environment. For example, the Falcon series from SpaceX utilizes liquid kerosene and oxygen, the New Shepard from Blue Origin uses liquid hydrogen and oxygen, and the VSS Unity from Virgin Galactic uses a hybrid propellant. The greenhouse effect and the warming of the stratosphere are exacerbated by the emissions of these propellants, which include alumina particles, black carbon, and greenhouse gasses. Liquid hydrogen and methane, which are considered “cleaner” fuels since they produce water vapor when burned, nevertheless pose serious environmental risks when discharged into the stratosphere.
The hazardous chemicals and metals released into the atmosphere during rocket launches are a major cause of air pollution. The principal ecological concern is the fact that rockets release black carbon, or soot, into the stratosphere, which is far more detrimental to the climate than comparable emissions close to or on Earth’s surface, as well as a carcinogen. Since stratospheric black carbon can absorb sunlight and radiate heat for as long as four years, it is approximately 500 times more harmful to the climate than Earth-based emissions. In addition to contributing to global warming, rocket launches also contribute to ozone depletion by releasing reactive chemicals such as Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Hydrogen Oxides (Hox), and Chlorine Oxides (ClOx), during high-temperature launch and re-entry events (Twiss, 2022). To put it into perspective, one rocket passenger produces one hundred times more pollution than an airplane passenger, demonstrating the enormous difference between the two in terms of their effect on the environment. This is because rocket emissions reach higher altitudes and persist longer in the atmosphere. Additionally, as much as five years can pass after the black soot emitted by the Falcon 9’s engines from burning kerosene reaches the stratosphere (Hall, 2024).
A lot of attention has been focused on RP-1, a refined kerosene that is used in a lot of rockets such as Saturn, Delta, Atlas, and SpaceX’s Falcon 9. This is because of its widespread use and the fact that these rockets are predicted to produce a sharp increase in black carbon emissions. In fact, every year, rockets powered by the RP-1 engine are thought to inject about 1,000 metric tons of black carbon into the stratosphere, where it could lead to substantial temperature rises and ozone depletion (Piesing, 2022). All the way from regional air pollution to more far-reaching effects on world climate patterns, these emissions could have a wide variety of negative effects on the environment.
Another environmental challenge posed by satellites is the issue of their reentry. The precise impact on global warming of the particles released into the atmosphere when satellites detonate on return is still unknown. A decade ago, the amount of material reentering the Earth’s atmosphere was around 200 tons per year; more recently, it climbed to an estimated 800 tons per year. The expansion of satellite constellations in LEO is a major factor that is predicted to speed up this trend, which might reach 16,000 tons per year in the next decade.
2.2 Space Debris
As far as space exploration is concerned, the accumulation of space debris is a major environmental hazard. At extremely dangerous speeds, this debris – which includes destroyed satellites, leftover rocket stages, and crash pieces – orbits Earth, endangering all operating spacecraft, including the International Space Station. According to statistical models, there are an estimated 130 million fragments smaller than 1 cm in orbit, along with one million pieces of debris ranging in size from 1 cm to 10 cm (ESA, 2023). The possibility of an uncontrollable, self-sustaining cloud of debris poses a serious threat to the future of space activities, as highlighted by the Kessler Syndrome, a theoretical chain reaction of collisions that leads to an exponential growth of debris.
The danger that operational satellites and future space missions face from space debris is becoming worse as the number of satellite constellations continues to grow. Rather than dealing with trash that is already in orbit, most efforts are aimed at preventing the creation of new garbage. The World Economic Forum has launched a new project called the Space Sustainability Rating to promote responsible behavior among space businesses.
There are far-reaching consequences for the environment caused by space debris that go beyond the mere possibility of orbital collisions. Large debris items, when they eventually re-enter Earth’s atmosphere, can cause pollution and endanger people and their property. Even while most debris burns up when it re-enters the atmosphere, what little remains has the potential to damage terrestrial ecosystems and human habitats across large distances.
The United Kingdom has taken a holistic strategy to reduce the threats posed by space debris. This includes policy, sustainability requirements, technical breakthroughs, missions to remove junk, and improved tracking and surveillance (UK Space Agency, 2023). The nation’s proactive posture is demonstrated by the UK Space Agency’s involvement in two Phase B Active Debris Removal mission studies, which Astroscale and ClearSpace were awarded with a total of £4 million (UK Space Agency, 2023). Research like this is crucial for picking a mission concept to build, launch, and demonstrate by 2026, demonstrating the UK’s competence in docking, rendezvous, and deorbiting old satellites (UK Space Agency, 2023).
In an innovative effort to address the growing issue of space debris, experts from Japan are in the forefront of using magnolia wood to build satellites. Under the guidance of Kyoto University’s Koji Murata, an unorthodox strategy has been developed to take advantage of magnolia wood’s desirable qualities for use in space, such as its low density and high degree of dimensional stability (Beattie, 2023). Wood samples were already transported into space for testing, proving that the material could withstand the extreme conditions of space, hence the concept has moved beyond the theoretical stages (Beattie, 2023). The creation of the LingoSat, a satellite prototype made of wood, represents a major step forward in this direction (Beattie, 2023). The LingoSat is an aluminum frame with wooden panels that showcases the viability of incorporating wood into satellite architecture (Beattie, 2023). It has the support of both the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and NASA. There is an immediate need for environmentally responsible space travel, and this project is an attempt to address that need (Beattie, 2023). There is growing fear that the ever-increasing amount of metal space debris might have negative effects on Earth’s ozone layer and climate change, in addition to being a major nuisance to satellite navigation and communications systems (Beattie, 2023).
3. Regulation Requirements
Despite the seriousness of these environmental impacts, minimal global regulation is presently in place to address space sustainability. While some work has gone into drafting recommendations, these are not legally enforceable and the decision to apply them rests with each country. Problems with issues such as the distribution of geostationary orbital slots bring up questions regarding fair distribution of space resources, which can benefit entities with more financial and technological resources (Twiss, 2022). The necessity for industry-led partnerships to address astronomical interference is underscored by the fact that large satellite constellations have the potential to obstruct astronomical observations.
Space launches in the United States are governed by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires government agencies to think about how their actions may affect the environment. Environmental assessments for rocket launch and satellite reentry must be conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in accordance with NEPA. Assessing and mitigating the environmental repercussions of space activities can be problematic due to NEPA’s limited scope and inconsistent efficacy across administrations. The space industry is still unregulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which controls sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Rocket launches and reentries are unique, making it difficult to apply established regulatory frameworks, even though the EPA has control over both stationary and mobile sources of pollutants (Twiss, 2022). The creation of focused environmental standards is impeded by the difficulty of establishing baseline data for emissions from space operations.
International cooperation and regulation are essential due to the global character of space activities. Environmental protection must be coordinated considering the rising launch frequency and the possibility of multinational satellite constellations. Applying the aviation industry’s newly enacted stringent emissions regulations to spaceflight presents substantial obstacles, but the sector could serve as a model for regulating emissions in the space business.
Academics, NGOs, and the public are all part of the rallying cry, which goes beyond governmental and corporate players. To promote a shared dedication to space exploration that is both environmentally responsible and ethically sound, it is essential to encourage open discussion about the potential consequences of space activities on Earth.
Conclusion
A striking example of human inquisitiveness and drive, the space race is one of humanity’s most awe-inspiring undertakings. However, the farther we go into space, the more important will be the need to reduce our impact on Earth and beyond. Because of the complexity and dynamic nature of the problem, it will take the combined efforts of all parties concerned to mitigate the space industry’s negative effects on the environment. Adopting sustainability practices throughout the whole space mission lifecycle is critical to the sector’s long-term viability. From conceptualization to launch, operation, and finally decommissioning or disposal, this covers everything throughout the space mission lifespan. Protecting the space environment and Earth’s biosphere requires following established rules for minimizing rocket launches’ environmental impact, handling space debris, and observing planetary protection measures. Governments, businesses, and international organizations will need to work together to create and implement rules and regulations that effectively address these concerns.
International cooperation is crucial for accomplishing these goals. Existing regulatory frameworks might not be able to completely handle the additional environmental problems brought about by the commercial space industries and space tourism’s quick expansion. Regulators must take into account the cumulative environmental impact of rocket launches as the business changes and look into new regulatory measures to make sure space exploration can grow sustainably. In the coming years, authorities, industry stakeholders, and the global community will face the critical task of balancing the scientific and economic advantages of space activities with the necessity to preserve Earth’s ecology. Due to the interconnected structure of our solar system and the fact that every person on Earth uses space for some purpose, we must work together to protect the space environment. In order for space to be a safe and welcoming place for generations to come, it is necessary to make sure that international standards, conventions, and best practices for space exploration are being developed and enforced.
References
Beattie, Elizabeth. “A Made-In-Japan Solution for Space Junk That Goes against the Grain.” The Japan Times, 17 Dec. 2023, www.japantimes.co.jp/environment/2023/12/17/sustainability/space-environmentally-sustainable-satellites/. B-2
Brown, Tyler S, et al. “Envisioning a Sustainable Future for Space Launches: A Review of Current Research and Policy.” Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, vol. 54, no. 3, 2 Feb. 2023, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2152467. B-2
Chen, Shenyan. “The Space Debris Problem.” Asian Perspective, vol. 35, no. 4, 2011, pp. 537–558, muse.jhu.edu/article/714026. C-2
Dallas, J.A., et al. “The Environmental Impact of Emissions from Space Launches: A Comprehensive Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 255, no. 1, May 2020, p. 120209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120209. C-2
Dowling, Stephen. “Just How Loud Is a Rocket Launch?” Www.bbc.com, 20 Apr. 2023, www.bbc.com/future/article/20230306-just-how-loud-is-a-rocket-launch. B-2
European Space Agency. “ESA’s Space Environment Report 2023.” Www.esa.int, 10 Aug. 2023, www.esa.int/Space_Safety/ESA_s_Space_Environment_Report_2023. A-1
Hall, Shannon. “The New Space Race Is Causing New Pollution Problems.” The New York Times, 9 Jan. 2024, www.nytimes.com/2024/01/09/science/rocket-pollution-spacex-satellites.html. B-2
Kiest, Kristina. “Projected Increase in Space Travel May Damage Ozone Layer.” NOAA Research, 21 June 2022, research.noaa.gov/2022/06/21/projected-increase-in-space-travel-may-damage-ozone-layer/. A-1
Kluger, Jeffrey. “There’s No Way to Make Space Travel Good for Planet Earth Right Now.” Time, 19 Apr. 2023, time.com/6273065/space-travel-climate-impact/. B-2
McKenna, Phil. “Space Tourism Poses a Significant “Risk to the Climate.”” Inside Climate News, 29 June 2022, insideclimatenews.org/news/29062022/space-tourism-climate/#:~:text=The%20study%20also%20found%20that. C-2
Nolan, Kay. “Thousands of Satellites Are Launched into Low Orbit. It Could Harm the Ozone Layer.” Washington Post, 5 Mar. 2023, www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2023/03/05/low-orbit-satellites-ozone-layer/. B-2
Piesing, Mark. “The Pollution Caused by Rocket Launches.” Www.bbc.com, BBC, 16 July 2022, www.bbc.com/future/article/20220713-how-to-make-rocket-launches-less-polluting. B-2
Ross, Martin N. “The Coming Surge of Rocket Emissions - Eos.” Eos, 24 Sept. 2019, eos.org/features/the-coming-surge-of-rocket-emissions. C-3
Ross, Martin N., and Karen L. Jones. “Implications of a Growing Spaceflight Industry: Climate Change.” Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, June 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2022.04.004. C-2
Ryan, Robert G., et al. “Impact of Rocket Launch and Space Debris Air Pollutant Emissions on Stratospheric Ozone and Global Climate.” Earth’s Future, vol. 10, no. 6, 9 June 2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ef002612. C-2
Suri, Rajeev. “What’s the Environmental Impact of Space Debris and How Can We Solve It?” World Economic Forum, 13 July 2022, www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/07/environmental-impact-space-debris-how-to-solve-it/. A-1
Twiss, Shannon. “The Environmental Impacts of the New Space Race.” Georgetown Law, 7 Apr. 2022, www.law.georgetown.edu/environmental-law-review/blog/the-environmental-impacts-of-the-new-space-race/. B-2
UK Space Agency. “Space Sustainability.” GOV.UK, 7 Oct. 2023, www.gov.uk/government/case-studies/space-sustainability. A-1
Vidaurri, Monica, and Alexander Gilbert. “Environmental Considerations in the Age of Space Exploration: The Conservation and Protection of Non-Earth Environments.” Bulletin of the AAS, vol. 53, no. 4, 18 Mar. 2021, https://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.f5bde04b. C-2
Wilson, Andrew R., & Vasile, Massimiliano. “The Space Sustainability Paradox.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 21 August 2023. C-2
World Economic Forum. “Space Sustainability Rating.” World Economic Forum, www.weforum.org/projects/space-sustainability-rating/. A-1
Zisk, Rachael. “The Space Industry’s Climate Impact: Part 1.” Payload, 8 Dec. 2023, payloadspace.com/the-space-industrys-climate-impact-part-1/. C-2
Zisk, Rachel. “The Space Industry’s Climate Impact: Part 2.” Payload, 15 Dec. 2023, payloadspace.com/the-space-industrys-climate-impact-part-2/. C-2
Zisk, Rachel. “The Space Industry’s Climate Impact: Part 3.” Payload, 22 Dec. 2023, payloadspace.com/the-space-industrys-climate-impact-part-3/. C-2
Information Content | ||
1 | Confirmed | Confirmed by other independent sources; logical in itself; coherent with other information on the topic |
2 | Presumably true | Not confirmed; logical in itself; coherent with other information on the topic |
3 | Maybe true | Not confirmed; reasonably logical in itself; coherent with some other information on the topic |
4 | Uncertain | Not confirmed; possible but not logical in itself; no other information on the topic |
5 | Improbable | Not confirmed; not logical in itself; contradicts with other information on the topic |
6 | Not able to be evaluated | No basis to evaluate the validity of the information |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||