"Pursuing Peace"
The next steps are going to be the hardest. Donald Trump insists, "Putin and Zelenskyy should meet", warning that "there may be consequences" for Moscow if they don't. "Let's see what happens in a week or two, at that point I will decide." However, the tycoon has acknowledged that "it is up to them, not us." The US president seems to understand the complexity of the conflict between Moscow and Kyiv. He recognizes not only the impossibility of pausing the fights, but also simply making the two dueling presidents meet. "Putting them together is as hard as mixing oil and vinegar", admits the White House resident. He will take two weeks to decide how to act: "We could impose heavy sanctions, duties or both. But we could also not do a single thing and say: this is your battle." And this last option is exactly the one that Kyiv fears the most.
On one hand, Putin does not plan to reach a peace agreement soon, since his troops are currently advancing in the Donbass region. The Russian president appears to be available during peace talks, but in reality he's postponing the agreement as much as possible. An attitude that irritated Donald Trump, who would like to find a solution quickly. On the other hand, Zelenskyy can't accept Moscow's request of conceding the Donbass territories without a security guarantee for Kyiv from the USA (and Europe).
Security
guarantees and no territorial cession
During
the National
Flag
Day,
Zelenskyy has been firm in his stance:
"We
won't give up our land to the occupant." However, Putin
won't stop autonomously; joint pressure is needed. "Our main
goal - said the Ukrainian president - is a reliable
and lasting peace for Ukraine and for Europe all." And
it is important that the impetus of all our meetings leads precisely
to this result." Therefore, pressure must be joint in order to
work well, a pressure made from Europe and the United States
together.
The mayor of Kyiv, Vitali Klitschko, warned against accepting weak security guarantees in negotiations with Russia. "Ukraine made this mistake once, in 1994, with the Budapest Memorandum", explained Klitschko on Welt TV. At the time, Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons - its arsenal was the third largest in the world, followed only by Washington and Moscow - in exchange for that, Russia promised to recognize the Ukranian independence and, although the West had assured Kyiv security guarantees in a political statement of intent, it did not stated any concrete guarantee of military assistance. This time, Klitschko warned that there must be really solid security guarantees. If Russia does not accept the entrance of Ukraine to Nato, "then we must find other structures for a long-term guarantee."
Independence
Anniversary, between threats and promises
British
intelligence warns that in
Russia the
use
of drones is taught in more than 500 schools,
with 2,500 teachers who have already received specific training. The
British intelligence services link the training activity to the
military offensive against Ukraine and highlight that the
introduction of drone training in classrooms demonstrates
the ongoing "militarization"
of the Russian educational system.
The Russian Minister of Education, Valery Falkov, announces the
government's intentions to form one
million specialists by 2030
and
the future creation of a
specific branch of the Armed Forces dedicated
to
drone operations.
Possible help in terms of security for Kyiv might come from Beijing. In fact, China may be willing to send soldiers to Ukraine as part of a UN-mandated peacekeeping mission. German newspaper Welt reported the news, citing diplomatic EU sources that are in touch with Chinese ones. These sources stressed, however, that the Beijing government would only be ready to participate "if peacekeeping forces were established under a United Nations mandate." In the meantime, the US Special Envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, visited Kyiv during the Ukrainian Independence Day, on August 24th.
Thirty-four
years later, Ukraine is still dealing with the legacy of Soviet rule.
The threat is no longer the USSR, but rather Vladimir Putin's
expansionist aims and historical revisionism. Kyiv has asked for
safety guarantees to the West and requested a face-to-face meeting
with the Russian president. But neither Washington (and Bruxelles)
nor Moscow are giving an answer.
Share the post
L'Autore
Giuliana Băruș
Studi in Giurisprudenza e Diritto Internazionale a Trieste.
Oltre che di Diritto (e di diritti), appassionata di geopolitica, giornalismo – quello lento, narrativo, che racconta storie ed esplora mondi – fotoreportage, musica underground e cinema indipendente.
Da sempre “permanently dislocated – un voyageur sur la terre” – abita i confini, fisici e metaforici, quelle patrie elettive di chi si sente a casa solo nell'intersezionalità di sovrapposizioni identitarie: la realtà in divenire si vede meglio agli estremi che dal centro. Viaggiare per scrivere – soprattutto di migrazioni, conflitti e diritti – e scrivere per viaggiare, alla ricerca di geografie interiori per esplorarne l’ambiguità e i punti d’ombra creati dalla luce.
Nel 2023, ha viaggiato e vissuto in quattro paesi diversi: Romania, sua terra d'origine, Albania, Georgia e Turchia.
Affascinata, quindi, dallo spazio post-sovietico dell'Europa centro-orientale; dalla cultura millenaria del Mediterraneo; e dalle sfaccettate complessità del Medio Oriente.
In Mondo Internazionale Post è autrice per la sezione “Organizzazioni Internazionali”.
Categories
Tag
Russia Russia-Ucraina USA NATO UE