Venezuela: A Geopolitical Battleground in the United States’ Own Backyard

Translated by Federico Emanuele

Recent tensions between the United States and Venezuela - triggered by an anti-drug operation in the Caribbean Sea and followed by the massive deployment of U.S. naval forces - have once again brought to the forefront the complex geopolitical dynamic that animates Washington’s “backyard.” While the Trump administration justified its actions as a strict fight against drug trafficking, for Caracas and its allies the picture looks very different: a show of force aimed at consolidating influence and destabilizing Nicolás Maduro’s regime, whose distance from Washington’s orbit has been a reality for decades.

The fight against drug trafficking: motive or pretext?

The trigger for the recent escalation was the U.S. State Department’s drug trafficking charges against President Maduro, including doubling the bounty on his head to $50 million and linking him to the “Cartel of the Suns.” These accusations are also based on previous U.S. convictions in 2016 for cocaine trafficking involving two nephews of Maduro’s wife, and on the confession of Hugo Carvajal, a former Venezuelan security official, in June 2025. The military escalation began with the sinking of a vessel suspected of transporting drugs, allegedly run by Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang, which left 11 dead.

Despite the accusations, the legitimacy of Washington’s actions has been questioned by other nations. Mexico, for example, expressed reservations, with President Claudia Sheinbaum stating that she had seen no documented evidence linking Maduro to Mexican cartels—raising doubts about the real political motivation behind U.S. measures. This episode highlights the fragility of attempts at détente, which only days earlier seemed to be taking shape with the extension of Chevron Corporation’s license—allowing the major U.S. oil company to operate in Venezuela—and ongoing talks over a possible prisoner exchange.

Despite the accusations, the legitimacy of Washington’s actions has been questioned by other nations. Mexico, for example, expressed reservations, with President Claudia Sheinbaum stating that she had seen no documented evidence linking Maduro to Mexican cartels - raising doubts about the real political motivation behind U.S. measures. This episode highlights the fragility of attempts at détente, which only days earlier seemed to be taking shape with the extension of Chevron Corporation’s license - allowing the major U.S. oil company to operate in Venezuela - and ongoing talks over a possible prisoner exchange.

The impact of sanctions and the rise of rival powers

Washington’s policy toward Venezuela has not been limited to military operations and drug trafficking accusations, but has also relied on economic sanctions as a tool of pressure. U.S. sanctions, increasingly imposed since 2017 and mainly targeting the oil sector, have had a devastating impact on Venezuela’s economy and, consequently, on the lives of its people. According to a report by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the sanctions have exacerbated the country’s preexisting economic and humanitarian crisis, hindering the import of essential goods such as food and medicine. Oil production, once the engine of the national economy, slowed dramatically from 2014 following the collapse of crude oil price, leaving Venezuela increasingly vulnerable and dependent on external aid.

In this context of weakness, powers such as Russia, China, and Iran have strengthened their presence. Russia has become Caracas’s main arms supplier and has shifted its strategy from the sale of military equipment to establishing local factories for weapons production, thereby ensuring a long-term foothold. China has invested heavily in infrastructure and the energy sector, allocating one billion dollars to new oil fields, and has supplied Venezuela with armaments, armored vehicles, and radar systems. Iran, meanwhile, has played a crucial role in the development of Venezuela’s drone program, contributing to the construction of a manufacturing plant and training local personnel.

Future scenarios: from escalation to unstable balance

The growing geopolitical competition in Washington’s backyard raises questions about possible future scenarios.

A first scenario is a further escalation, guided by the Monroe Doctrine that drives the United States to reaffirm its hegemony. This could take shape through harsher sanctions, increased military operations in the Caribbean Sea, and stronger support for the domestic opposition. The risk in this scenario is that even a minor incident could quickly spiral into a wider conflict, indirectly involving rival powers and turning Venezuela into a stage for a proxy war.

A second scenario, more plausible in the medium term, is the preservation of an unstable balance. Neither Washington nor its rivals have an immediate interest in a direct conflict. Russia is absorbed by the war in Ukraine, China is focused on its economic expansion and strategic competition in the South China Sea, and Iran is facing internal and regional challenges. In this context, Venezuela would remain a political and ideological battleground, with global powers continuing to compete for military and economic influence without direct intervention. Such a situation of “non-peace” would extend the Venezuelan crisis, preventing any real economic or political recovery.

A third scenario, although less probable, envisions a controlled détente. This could emerge through negotiations mediated by regional actors such as Mexico or international players, aiming to reach a compromise that includes normalized relations, easing of sanctions, and an agreement on a political transition. Such a path would require flexible leadership and a willingness from all sides to compromise, something that has been absent so far but could surface in a moment of fatigue or shifting strategic priorities.

The recent tensions between the United States and Venezuela, although sparked by a drug trafficking pretext, reveal far deeper geopolitical dynamics. The escalation is not simply an attempt to undermine Nicolás Maduro’s regime, but above all a warning signal from Washington in response to the growing influence of Russia, China, and Iran in its traditional sphere of influence. The future of Venezuela, therefore, is no longer exclusively an internal or regional matter. It is increasingly a crucial piece in a global chess match. Its fate remains tied to the ability of the United States and its rivals to manage this complex competition without allowing it to spiral into open conflict, in a context where the fragile geopolitical balance of the region is constantly under strain.

Mondo Internazionale APS - Riproduzione Riservata ® 2025